RE:RE:RE:RE:Ce qu'en pense Michel Girard (opinion)Hey ralfy
I don't make opinions on something I don't read or know little about.
The end game whether they cud have done it differently or not has become a positive something that "eat your own" quebecer for his self interest, as he has always done with his so called unbiased journalism.
He has bad mouthed with no let up everything that related to bombardier whther it be Bombardier itself, the government or any of its supporters for his own hypocritical self interest and have relayed such directly to him while he has never even bothered to acknowledge any communication let alone answer back.
At leats the globe and trash answered back on many occasions .
What have you done ???
raphaelle2 wrote:
Hey Club, For once I agree with Girard. His article is straight to the point and exact. I suggest you read it before commenting on something you dont understand or parroting others shallow posts. At that time legault was highly critical of Couillard for not investing in the BBD capital action instead of the C-series. They ( the Liberals) made also additionals blunders with the way they supported the C- series. Had they done better educated choice(particularly b Anglade then economy minister under Couillard) the Qc investment would have generated significant return, as rightly evaluated by Girard ( who, by the way acknowledge the remarkable SP rebound of the new bizjets company. GLTA.