RE:No reverse split Nnwwzz wrote: The level of competency among the vocal and novice shareholders here is astoundingly low. Non-existent dd/fact finding skills. Poor comprehension and retention skills. Poor critical thinking skills. https://youtu.be/G46lTEXmrg0?t=12m30s Here's the ceo stating, in a publicly available (and even mentioned in a nr) interview, that the size of the current share structure (400-600m) is intended and strategic to attracting a larger presence of institutional investors (liquidity). This has been known for a good little while now, yet people keep bringing this topic up without any reference to, or knowledge of, really, the CEO's own words. Says a lot about these so called 'investors.'
sane ceo that said there would be revenue in q3 and 4 of this year and both smartwall and even battery would be shipped in q3 and 4. Same ceo that said new 3D mild for better production would be shown to us months ago.
As the omnipotent one on this board oh great one can you enlighten us on why your dd and the ceo statements are not in line with events and why we should then believe you and the ceo on the share structure.
cmon man quit insulting posters and putting yourself as some wise sage. This is a penny stock start up that hasn't delivered yet. It's all on next year at the earliest now and still a very risky play. That's my uneducated underresearched poor investor belief. In my humble opinion it is accurate at this time. You are welcome to your opinion without the need for malice or insult. Just a bit of humour for lightening the mood.