RE:RE:RE:The commercial BioCloud?canyousayiii wrote: My question is whether there are any performance differences. I would like to think not. I would like to think that they would design a product that would most quickly be able to sample and test the air for the virus. So, the quickest device possible without caring whether it will be put into a 1,000 square foot space or 2,000 square foot space. Furthermore, if there are no major cost differences, make the best looking product you can. Why would you go to an industrial client and say: "Here's your BioCloud. We have a sleeker looking one but since you are an industrial client, we give you this uglier box." In other words, if no performance differences, balance the cost and the looks and come up with the best looking design that everyone will like. I have some friends working in manufacturing facilities and some in offices and when it comes to style and taste for food, clothes, cars, etc, there are no systemic differences. All things being equal, everyone will find an Adidas slip-on plastic sandal nicer than the dollar store one. So, in terms of this discussion, I am now suddenly asking the question of why the distinction between the industrial and commercial? There is no discussion on the website or I have not heard anything about differences in performance and cost. If you can sell and make money on an ugly one for the price of $3,000 to the client, just get on with it.
Speaking of differentiation, the commercial units remind me of bathroom paper-towel dispensers. To prevent a unit being unnecessarily manhandled by its popluace, I'd want to tape a note to it saying OUT OF PAPER.