RE:Better to perform first and write history later! Good4You wrote: And performing first is not losing $3 on the SP in 4 months, from $8 to $5, while telling the world the CEO expects his company to sign $65 MM within 6 months ( pure reality on last April 16th). In my book this is more like dust in the eyes...and a very poor image of performance questioning PYR's CEO CREDIBILITY. With the last two $11 MM total contracts signed, Peter is short of $54MM of his initial $65 MM expected signed contracts and has now 4 days to bring in the $54 MM remaining contracts. (The equivalent of 5 x $11MM US Navy signed contracts). I'm quite sure Peter won't be able to perform to his own expectations within the rest of the week and won't write any new page of PYR'S history for a while...until maybe finally one big contract is signed . Could it be tomorrow or this week???lol Any day, any time but "smooth" got us used to STAGNATION and a frozen SP. I believe we would be better off with a real performing EO. Someone how could drive PYR without having to throw dust in our eyes so we become Longs but permanently Blind .It is clear the market expects PYR 's CEO to perform to his expectations or he should stop in the future throwing dust in our eyes. Well let's wait and see: 4 market days left! Just a matter of PYR CEO's credibility! The next 4 days will speak! Good4You
Must you constantly question Pyrogenesis CEO credibility. Sp had definitely been manipulated no question.
For growth stocks one looks at forward looking latent value. Imho...Current sp entry point will one day imho be folklore.
Investors w the foresight to see this explosive upside in growth stocks such as PYR will be imho greatly rewarded. Especially with this many amazing verticals that can dominate their targeted industries...many in the multi billions.
No way will I want to be on the sidelines watching Pyrogenesis prove this potential.
Long and strong PYROGENESIS