RE:ThoughtsThat's the big question that will be answered if competing bids surface or not. If there is truly embeded value in the tech and IP that hasn't necesarily translated into revenue as of yet then that should be reflected in a purchase price. If at the end of the day the company sells to Kubota for 75 cents without other bidders surfacing then it suggests OEMs think no additional value exists. Other bidders may be disuaded from making a bid given that Kubota can match any offer so IMO a potential new suitor would have to offer a significant premium over the current bid to have a shot at acquiring AJX. Given that it possible that any other interested parties simply don't bother doing the work to make a bid. On the other hand there are several reasons why another bidder could emerge. So who could a new bidder be? Either an existing customer that is behind the tech curve (e.g. Mahindra), another unrelated industry participant that has been left stranded from recent industry consolidation (e.g. Agco), or perhaps a competitor of Kubota that wants to block them from acquiring AJX tech and the ability to launch IP lawsuits (e.g. Deere/CNH). It's also possible that Kubota sweetens their offer somewhat (e.g. 85 cents) given the lackluster response to the offer from many shareholders. We shall see. The stock is trading as if investors expect Kubota to modestly sweeten their offer. Time will tell.