Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Invesque Ord Shs T.IVQ

Alternate Symbol(s):  MHIVF | T.IVQ.DB.U | T.IVQ.DB.V

Invesque Inc. is a health care real estate company. The Company owns a portfolio of North American properties across the health care spectrum. The Company invests in a portfolio of predominantly privately paid senior housing communities. The Company's portfolio includes investments primarily in independent living, assisted living, and memory care, which are operated under long-term leases and joint venture arrangements with industry operating partners. The Company's portfolio also includes investments in owner-occupied seniors housing properties in which the Company owns the real estate, the licensed operations, and provides management services through Commonwealth Senior Living, LLC. It owns a portfolio of over 56 properties in the United States, comprised of 53 assisted living and memory care facilities and three skilled nursing facilities. In Canada, the Company owns an interest in four seniors housing assets.


TSX:IVQ - Post by User

Comment by Capharnaumon Oct 14, 2021 12:59pm
83 Views
Post# 34005776

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Value of U debentures

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Value of U debenturesI also want to add that they didn't have to try and force the deal for all holders. They could have made the offer so that those voting against would see the date and conditions extended, and they could have told those voting against would be redeemed at 22% cash + shares (or whichever combo they would have done).

If the offer was that "interesting", surely this wouldn't have been a problem, would it?
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>