Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd. T.KGI


Primary Symbol: T.KL

Kirkland Lake Gold Ltd is a Canada-based gold mining, development, and exploration company with a diversified portfolio of exploration projects. The production profile of the company includes the Macassa mine complex located in northeastern Ontario and the Fosterville gold mine located in the State of Victoria, Australia. Also, the company owns the Holt mine and the Detour mine. The company's mines and material mineral projects are located in Canada and Australia.


TSX:KL - Post by User

Comment by dutchmann64on Oct 20, 2021 9:02am
209 Views
Post# 34026183

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Solve this equation to assess the deal. Here’s mine

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Solve this equation to assess the deal. Here’s mine
TheZooo wrote:
dutchmann64 wrote:
TheZooo wrote:
dutchmann64 wrote:
TheZooo wrote:
Shermandrock1 wrote: (46% X 100% world class) + ((54% X ((1 Property world class) + (Remaining properties marginal)) = bad deal

Yep, KL shareholders are contributing world class properties to shore up, on the whole, a mediocre company. Sort of like ordering the best  cut of beef from a marginal cow and being charged a premium price. 

Yeah bud youre stupid so what do you know Sherm?


Zoo


Just my opinion;....The realitly is that Sean Created value for his share holder base by taking the KL share holders to the cleaners. Did it by awarding Tony with a big new seat in the company. I would like to see Tony's compensation package for this moving forward. Another question;....why was this not discussed openly prior to any move forward on a deal. AEM and KL as stand alone entities were doing just fine. No urgency to fix any issues. Why one wonders? Again nothing here but spin form Both Tony and Sean IMHO. To each there own I guess.

 

Hag, Aem is a great company thus the better valuation than kl. Its always been so. More mines and plenty of upside. The north is an unexplored jewel box with no infrastructure. They have their own landing strips to use as bases. They have more mines, more, assets, more ozs than kl. Kl is putting Australia on the auction block, thats the word. Aem is the better company. That said, I sold mine as im tired of gold. It moves up and down for reasons that are beyond me. So good luck and dont eat too much chocolate.


Zoo



That is another look at it for sure;.....I won't disagree AEM is a well established company;.... but with that said BOYD did get the better deal with no premium to the KL holders.   Now going to eat some Gestampte Muisjes.......lekker goed 
 


Well why not look at it the other way. Kl got aem with no premium. 

 

Zoo



Yes.....always two sides to a coin.  Time will tell. 

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>