RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:New board memberFrost19 wrote
I see some others have posted and I don't want to pile on too much.
~87k is "almost double" 50k...not sure why you consider that statement a glaring error.
2.19B is similar to 2.3B in market cap so again not sure where the glaring error is there. I never mentioned anything about EV.
That part of my original post was merely pointing out that Kleckner came from a comparable company, not a company 20x smaller or 20x larger than VET.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
"87 k is almost double 50k ... not sure why you consider that statement a glaring error."
Likely because he isnt that smart and cant do simple math.
"2.19B is similiar to 2.3B i market cap. so again not sure where the glaring error is there."
There is no glaring error. In fact in the next post after he posted that VETs market cap. was way more than 2.3B he agreed with the next poster who said it was $2.19B
Just another fellow who needs attention and trys to get it by spouting a lot of numbers all day long on Stockhouse which are wrong quite a lot of the time. Numbers like market cap. and barrels of oil production are quite simple and dont need a lot of interpretation.
If he gets simple things like that wrong that should tell you what he really knows.
He thinks hes the smartest guy around but the facts tell a different story.