RE:RE:RE:the beat goes on ..whoLuLu wrote: yes, very interesting, will follow, thanks for the post ,GL
Re the section on energy evolution and transition, some won't like it because it has a lot of common sense and logic.
It does not use the word crisis nor the term existential threat or panic stuff such as "self destruct in 10 years". It also suggests there are right locations for wind mills and right locations for solar and not a matter of installing them just because they are in vogue. Where do you suppose Ottawa is in that regard?
"Full panic mode"? Keep the people in fear to justify over exuberance in application of carbon tax?