RE:@randomtask your calculation getting better and better Pretty obsessive of you and still nothing of your own to support YOUR prediction of profitability? Let's see it, show the board how you are coming up with this insanely unrealistic thought
whisky11 wrote:
randomtask (1754)
User Actions
April 29, 2021 - 03:38 PM
50 Reads
Post# 33095189
RE:Randomtask stop lying QoQ covers different number of
Namaste was definitely not profitable or even close to it. They needed $84M in revenues in Q1 just to breakeven, nevermind profit. Quarters don't matter?? What planet are you on? FAF's QoQ grew, HITI QoQ grew both by double digits yet Namaste shrunk by double digits. FAF had positive adjusted EBITDA for Q3, Q4 and fiscal 2020; maybe you're confused them with this penny stock?
This is how you've gotten your name, Lying Lhama. At this point i don't know if you're severely uneducated, ignorant to facts, a pathalogical liar or just plain old daft. It's one of the four, so you let us know which one you identify as.
What is highlighted below is a complete lie and could never be justified.