RE:RE:RE:RE:Market Chatter. GLTALongsIn Detail ??? Lol......There is no need to go into detail. It is very simple Edward Rogers is chair of the family trust which owns 97% of the VOTING shares.....The family can drag it out if they like but at the end of the day Edward will get his way.....Case Closed !!
Personally I really dont care either way, I am just trading this and making $$$ with the current family nonsense and will be fully out when it gets back into the low 60's.
shareholders1 wrote: " the law is the law... " What ?
Can you please explain, in detail, what the law is and each side's interpretation of the law?
The dispute and the application of the BCCA (including section 180) to the facts, including the company's By Laws, seems a bit more involved than you have determined.