PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

RE:RE:RE:GogoTV

[gojotv!]

Hey, ScienceFirst, I'm glad you impugned my character by spouting all your bigoted stereotypes about salespeople. Revealing...

Meanwhile, to employ your phrase, "Funny that you didn't consider (or intentionnaly omitted) couple of basic key elements here;"

- The fact that cold pelletization techniques are being tested and used in this application, and that they are more energy-efficient than PYR's plasma torches...
- The fact that the government of Canada has shown a keen interest in subsidizing green technologies, and that no company is going to pass up a subsidy when their competitors will get that money. It is in their interest to wait, maybe for a year or so, to negotiate their take.
- The fact that a request for quote is not a sale.
- The fact that PYR has patents for their tech only, and not ALL tech in the pelletization field.
- The fact that PYR's share price has already gone parabolic, and that its real value, given the huge share float, (half of which isn't even on the market because Peter has it) and current revenues, is actually under the current share price.
Dude.
I keep asking pumpers on this board to do the math, and all they do is conspiracy theories, hype and blather.

ScienceFirst wrote: Gogotv ... No kidding!  You care spending time here for something you believe has 10% of chance of succeeding!!!  Wow!

Sad that you tell us that you have sales experience.  Usually, salesmen are not seen as honest in their answers.  Only focused on their pocket, ready to lie to get a sale.  Which ressemble your presence here.

Funny that you didn't consider (or intentionnaly omitted) couple of basic key elements here; 

- this is an industrial Client for which there is not many alternatives  
- PYR owns a patent on this plasma torch for the iron pelletization market
- fossil-burners have not been displaced by other technologies over the last 40 years
- I posted 2 scientific papers (2016 and 2020) confirming the benefits of plasma torches over fossil-fuel burners
- 3 iron pelletization Clients have shown interest and advanced to a next step
- PYR did a pilot in Sweden in 2019 that confirmed the viability of such technology over the legacy technology
- This Client A has done a successful pilot with 1 torch already.  So it's not like they didn't collect data or that it was for a first buy!  
- This Client stated this on Sept. 01, 2020:  is pleased to announce the completion and acceptance of its modeling contract with Client A (the “Client”) which confirmed, amongst other things, that replacing fossil fuel burners with PyroGenesis’ proprietary plasma torches addresses the Client’s greenhouse gas reduction strategy/policy.
- Other similar Client (Clietn B - so Rio Tinto) informed PYR that after the 4 torches on Sept. 21, they expect to buy 130 more.  

Clearly, you're not impressing any here with your "sale" experience!   It lacks depth.  Coming from a salesman, that's not surprizing.

But according to your own statement, what do you do here if PYR only has 10% of chances of winning such contract?  The answer is easy;  you're bashing this stock to have the ability to buy more on the cheap side with a FUD strategy.   So that's because you know this technology will work.  Otherwise, why would you spend a dime investing in something that would fail?

But you're right.  There's no garantee in life.  So I bet your 3$ range target will never materialize.

_____________________

gojotv! - (11/1/2021 1:46:51 PM)
RE:GogoTV

Dude, you clearly have no sales experience.
I do. 
For every ten "requests for quote", one buys.
And for the one who does, a request for quote means they want to see what price to start stalling and dickering from.
Business isn't magic.

ScienceFirst wrote:

GogoTV thinks that, on June 3rd, Client B asked for a Request for Quote (RFQ) for 36 torches because they didn't have anything else to do. ... lollll