RE:Not an IssueThe bias in the core assays is not significant. The cores are split. Each lab had a half. Each half is not going to be exactly the same. It is not an issue. It is distracting from this statement in the notice:
"Recognizing the nuggety nature of gold mineralization at Queensway, for the last several months ..."
This tells you there is visible gold in the core samples that have not been assayed yet.
Pay attention. When there is visible gold that is significant.
NO GEEZER you are in great error. Look at TRU and the beautiful
pics of visible gold they had in their announcement yesterday.
Stock is down today and for good reason. Just because you have
visible gold does not meant anything until the assays are done.
As well the nuggety nature is the big deal that can really mess
up assay results. NVO for years has struggled quantifying a lot
of their assets because of the extreme nuggety nature in the
Nulagine can really mess up reliable assays no matter what
methodology is used.
VG can be significant especially if their is a lot but it is still only
regarded as an indicator in most cases that you might have
something significant. IKE