Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.

Marathon Gold Corp MGDPF


Primary Symbol: T.MOZ

Marathon Gold Corporation is a Canada-based gold exploration and development company. The Company’s primary business focus is the exploration and development of its flagship asset, the wholly owned Valentine Gold Project, located in Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. The project comprises a series of five mineralized deposits along a 32- kilometer system. Its prospects are located along the Valentine Lake Shear Zone and include Frank Zone, Rainbow Zone, Triangle Zone, Victoria Bridge, Narrows, Victory Southwest, Victory Northeast, and the Berry Zone. In addition to the Valentine Gold Project in the Central Region of Newfoundland and Labrador, the Company holds 100% interests in the Bonanza Mine, a former mine located in Baker County in northeastern Oregon, the Gold Reef property, an exploration property consisting of approximately 12 hectares of claims located near Stewart, British Columbia; and a 2% net smelter returns royalty on precious metal sales by the Golden Chest mine in Idaho.


TSX:MOZ - Post by User

Comment by Ridgebackon Nov 05, 2021 1:04pm
142 Views
Post# 34092861

RE:EIS/IAAC

RE:EIS/IAAC

Most people would not understand how much effort it takes to compile all the requirements needed to gain approval to start building. There are a number of labs and engineering firms hired and working with Marathon to achieve a successful outcome to comply with expected standards. Ongoing testing in every aspect of the operation is under the microscope. Anyone wanting to read those reports find a few weeks just to cover what has been requested and replied to, let alone understand the parameters of testing and reporting. As I said before a daunting task for any company and an expensive proposition. 

Here's one on Human Health Issue for V. Lake done by Stantec Engineering. Most of us would just like to get on with the build but as Manson said "not quite over the finish line". I wonder how many of the recent exloration companies even have the budget to get it done or undersatnd what it will take?

Table of Contents ABBREVIATIONS .....................................................................................................................III 1.0 INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................. 4 2.0 HUMAN HEALTH RISK ASSESSMENT METHODS ..................................................... 4 2.1 COMPONENTS OF HEALTH RISK................................................................................ 5 2.2 RISK ASSESSMENT APPROACH AND FRAMEWORK................................................ 6 3.0 SITE CHARACTERIZATION.......................................................................................... 9 3.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING ........................................................................................ 9 3.2 SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL BOUNDARIES ..................................................................10 3.2.1 Spatial Boundaries .......................................................................................10 3.2.2 Temporal Boundaries...................................................................................15 3.3 RECEPTOR LOCATIONS.............................................................................................15 3.4 CHEMICALS OF POTENTIAL CONCERN ....................................................................16 4.0 PROBLEM FORMULATION .........................................................................................19 4.1 RECEPTOR CHARACTERIZATION .............................................................................19 4.1.1 General Receptor Assumptions....................................................................20 4.1.2 Specific Assumptions for Indigenous Receptors...........................................20 4.1.3 Specific Assumptions for Non-Indigenous Receptors ...................................20 4.1.4 Specific Assumptions for Off-Duty Workers..................................................21 4.2 EXPOSURE PATHWAYS..............................................................................................21 4.2.1 Inhalation Exposures....................................................................................21 4.2.2 Direct Contact Exposures.............................................................................21 4.2.3 Surface Water Exposures ............................................................................22 4.2.4 Country Food Exposures..............................................................................22 4.3 BASELINE AND FUTURE CASE EXPOSURE POINT CONCENTRATIONS................22 4.3.1 Air 22 4.3.2 Soil...............................................................................................................29 4.3.3 Surface Water..............................................................................................30 4.3.4 Country Foods .............................................................................................33 4.4 CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL .......................................................................................36 5.0 TOXICITY ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................40 5.1 SELECTION OF EXPOSURE BENCHMARKS FOR 1-HOUR NO2. ..............................40 6.0 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT.........................................................................................41 6.1 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT FOR INDIGENOUS RECEPTORS...................................41 6.2 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT FOR NON-INDIGENOUS RECEPTORS..........................41 6.3 EXPOSURE ASSESSMENT FOR OFF-DUTY WORKERS...........................................42 7.0 RISK CHARACTERIZATION........................................................................................42

<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>