RE:RE:Politics Aside
enriquesuave wrote: I'm hoping we can get 3 out the next 6 CR or better. ( even 2 out of 6 would be decent). That would make it 7 out of 12 patients who got optimized treatment in PH2 or 9 out of 14 if we include the 2 from PH1 who also get an optimized treatment. We would be beating competition at 3 months data and with only one single treatment Vs many many more. Of course anything better and we start to make the competition look real bad. All IMo
Thanks for keeping track of the optimized treatment numbers...it can be a blur sometimes. Just hoping the team spells out this data clearly in their next update. Really liking our simplified two-treatment approach, which most definitely should encourage patient enrollment/retention.
On the flip-side, the treatment burden & side effects of the other "treatment-intensive" options often promote poor patient retention/compliance. Their loss just might be our gain imo.