RE:investor relations section on websiteAs we commented on the last news release, when citing projects and feasibility studies, it was not clear whether the discussion about wastewater was in general or whether it pertained to Sharc involvement. Many of us have learned that when it is not clear, we should not assume it is directly related to Sharc. Many of us have also learned when something was directly attributed to Sharc, the probability of the final successful outcome was pretty close to zero. If I reflect on the past and what was told, the current presentations do not nearly sound as exciting as those projects and relationships that were supposed to add up to $100s of millions over a few short years. Sharc needs to land a couple of contracts with big $s clearly spelled out to start building credibility. Otherwise, just lay your playing money like you would on any other spec and hope that in this basket of gambles, one can more than offset what you may lose on the others. Crypto's in my mind are a much better bet for a very small investment, if you can figure out how to directly invest into some of those. Setting up Bitcoin wallets a decade ago required a lot of digging and work and it likely discouraged many from doing it.