RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Actually... the Conf Call didn't impress meHello Charni.
I thank you for your input.
You stated, "Also re Cobalt's statement that coal is still used as a primary energy source - what you can do is buy the energy from these sources (if required) when power is being sold cheaply (at night) and store it for use during high energy pricing. Lowers production costs."
RESPONSE: Yes! Yes and yes!
You've clearly understood - i.e. without me having to draw a pastel crayon coloured picture for you; as I would have to do for Cobalt, lol
Energy inputs savings contribute directly to and allow for a healthier balance sheet and obviously more 'profitable' mining operations.
Also, I am familiar with that company producing a grid and micro-grid applicable battery storage solution, capable of 100 hours of energy storage capacity.
If I am not mistaken, that particular company has some major financial backers and is presently collaborating with one of America's oldest, largest and most influential electricity grid and micro-grid provisioning companies, with respect to retrofitting a major New York State electricity distribution providers' project infrastructure with such grid and micro-grid battery storage solutions. For specific reason, the particular name of the company I refer to temporarily eludes me at this moment.
Never the less, should we be referring to the same battery storage solutions provider, I'll let you know that such a grid and micro-grid battery storage solutions provider maintains the proprietary technological capability to concurrently charge and discharge the 100 hours of battery storage capacity. You'll note that such a specific and proprietary technological capability is, to say the least, most unique and most sought after by the biggest electrical distribution and grid and micro-grid maintaining utilities providers throughout America and, indeed, the world.
Alas, some people have absolutely no clue as to the synergies which Mr. Friedland's various investments in grid and micro-grid battery storage technologies provisioning companies, EV battery cell development and manufacturing companies, green intiatives and Net Zero C02 credits trading companies, etc, can in fact produce for Ivanhoe Mines Limited going forward.
I've recently posted information (see parts #1 and #2) speaking to just how such synergistic potentials would be directly contributing to the ability for Ivanhoe Mines Limited management to most profitably bulk up the company's bottom line EPS figures going forward.
Moreover, ask yourself just how much unexpected and certainly uncalculated additional revenue generation would result from the carbon credits selling initiatives which I first mentioned for the edification of all Ivanhoe Mines Limited bulletin board readers.
I'll say it time and again. Too many people simply don't know that the projected revenues derived from the particpants in such a C02 credits trading industry going forward, are off the charts, so to speak.
Yes, I was 'over the moon' when Mr. Friedland specifically mentioned VRB Energy, a 'currently' privately controlled company, as potentially providing a renewables solar energy solution for the Platreef project.
I certainly have more to contribute charni.
Thanks again.