RE:RE:RE:RE:Why the 3Q Investor Reaction I presume, 'take responsibility' means; someone gets canned?
Pretty sure that already happened.
SCQuin wrote: Actually, the negative investor reaction was caused by the Q3 ER that shows Auxly is clearly losing momentum in the critical area of becoming cash-flow-positive. It seems now that investors will have to wait until the Q2 ER to see if this will even be possible in 2022. Someone in the company (the management team) needs to take responsibility for the fact they are not positioned to meet the demand for their products.
The failure here falls squarely on the equipment manufacturer.It's not easy holding people outside of your own company accountable. It's outside of AUXLY's control.
That said, I'm pretty sure the recommendation of the manufacturer likely originated from Imperial Brands. If that's the case then I expect that's being handled appropriately.
I find it amazing how in a sea of positivity, it's the negative that gets focussed on.
Even the least bullish analysts target Auxly at twice its current SP, rate it a BUY and consider it UNDERVALUED!
But if running around screaming, 'Off with their heads,' turns your crank... well, to each his own.
yeah. A pleasant surprise would be nice for a change but all I'd like to see is an appropriate valuation for Auxly.
The equipment delivery is out off AUXLY's control. It sucks, but if Q4 sees 8% market share and Revs come in at C$32million or more without machinery...??
You whiners will all still find something to wank about...!
Hang in there mates.
cheers