RE:Results?Thank you, Diabase, I believe that mention: "
And for all those other companies that have used either ALS or Eastern for their assays, what are they doing about their results?" is the first time anybody has mentioned this on this board...and about time someone did!
I should think that all those companies sending split-core to one or the other are quietly asking themselves EXACTLY that question...who do we believe...and what are we supposed to do about it?? But not NFG....no no, they stepped up to the plate - and came up with an affirmative action plan! On the one hand, some method of back-checking in the here and now the previous contested results from a process used by the entire industry...and on the other, let's put in place a faster, simpler method...where if you have a fly up your nose about the veracity of results released...then go ahead...here are the original samples! (And maybe you could pay for it!)
I can only imagine if the likes of us are holding our breaths to see how the secondary testing of fire-assay results is resolved...then think for a minute how oxygen-deprived the rest of the companies in our sector might be getting...waiting for the balloon to go up for them!
el d
diabase1 wrote: Somebody said that the SP will get down to 6.75. He/she may be right. The bias in results between ALS and Eastern will take some time to sort out. Everybody thinks that the Chrysos method will prevail. Maybe it will. What if the results from the Chrysos testing over in Perth stacks up somewhere between the results of ALS and Eastern. What then? It's going to take a little more time to sort out this problem. With that in mind, I cannot see NFG releasing any assay results for several months. Too bad NFG wouldn't give us an update on what's happening in Perth. Shareholders deserve it!! And for all those other companies that have used either ALS or Eastern for their assays, what are they doing about their results? Do they have biases also, one high and one low?