RE:RE:truthyour mistake is beleiveing they desire a sustainable company, that's far secondary, if at all....no, see it was alllllll about the BIG GET, and swicthing back to tomatoes, well is that suddenly going to bring a huge influx of cash form investors? No. The switch was initially made to get the BIG GET, and THEY got theirs, ohhh did they ever, they got it all right, and GONE....so many like this in this industry.
The exec class, as shown all over this industry, gets theirs in the initial investor "collection", then dissappear....whether the company left suckceeds or not is NOT the heart of the matter....they got their big haul, take off and forget the rest....move on to doing it again...funded off the backs of ma n pa investors. It's a nice scam they got. Biz 101 in the 21st.