RE:RE:RE:RE:Read again the last NRratsnake,
a few things. First off all it is very unrealistic to expect that anyone should be able to answer what the revenue projections are here. Only the top management will know or have some sort of an idea to this even ir doesn't know as he throws our hypothetical figures as to how much the company will possibly get per chip so don't expect an answer from any of us. This is and remains a pre-rev company until it is established and I suspect as the news releases along with the contracts and breakdowns come maybe people will be able to project things then but not until--this is a very imposssible inquiry and really useless to ask all of us here.
In so far as your second point, first off you would really have to be something else to think that there won't be any revenue coming despite you constantly drudging up the past where it was painful evident that the tech the Dbros were working on was all fine and dandy for theoretical suppositions or one which maybe will be seen ahead of its time. This same problem happened with Poet and still is a problem in that they have to adapt the tech to make their own markets. Think it this way, when anything is coming out and there is no structure in place you will have to make them and put it in place you can liken this to when the ev started to come. Did they have the charging stations in place? How long did it take to come? What about the prototyping of the vehicle itself? You know that it first theoretically worked. Then there were limited uses and constant testing to going to production at very high prices that very few people could afford to they hybrid to ones that actually went x distance over a single charge that took possibly a day vs hours and limited speed. All of this had to take time and go through a process. What the Dbros was trying to do was something where there was no tech that would accomodate what they were working on and they would have to literally like Poet create that structure the company would be super broke to go that route. Poet took various parts of its platform and adjusted it to the components sold in the markets and sold into it but as a platform as a whole it is still way out it did not realize what it was meant for and it may still be time yet however the new management successfully monetized what it could and is continue to take benefit from that move that is just the way it is with tech. Some will be adapted and monetize in a way the company can survive others will have to be cut bait otherwise it would drag the company down like what was seemingly evident with Blade Optics and the lenses.
In any case, that is the past this is the prestent with a huge and promising looking future. You keep going on about the past who did the company really have to feed into? Nobody!!!! Even General Dynamics proved to be a flop because the tech was just not viable. Flash forward to today, with all the testing and tech built and with 3 super key partners do you honestly think the same thing will happen? And how many times will you keep harping on this? It is kind of a really tired old tune but I suppose you will say it is because that is what the company is giving sure--but that is all still tied up with the others making the call as to when information will be dissiminated there is a very low probability that nothing happens here I am just saying. like less than 2% low but sure if people want to question and keep looking at the past what can you say?
Now in regards to your other part what you said is not necessary true. There were companies in social media had 0 to limited revenue but was free and maybe costed them with having ads posted on the pages as part of piggybacking off them and it was based on the usage and repeat use that others like the big companies saw took notice and bought out. So if the tech is viable which this clearly looks to be the monies isn't necessarily in sales which I find it extremely difficult and near impossible to not happen but really in the property that can be practically used and integration and there is no doubt we are seeing it here.
Regardless, I agree with Don the revenue will come when it does and if people are so hell bent on it like other posters stated they will wait for $1-$5 to buy back in or you just simply buy cheaper hold and wait--one you have wait time and depending how you see things frustration that is the cost the other will cost you more in terms of monies per share not overall dollar value you may wish to spend.
To me it is just a matter of when vs if and this is way different than times of past--we will get revenue around the corner. Let's see and then see where things go. Last press is actually very telling and great to see how much the big three engineers are involved. My question is do you think they will waste time being involved inviting companies to their preferred partners portal for both parties not to benefit??? I have said this for a long period of time but you keep thinking what you want and trade away make your profits near term nothing wrong with that but things can and most likely pop when one least expect it so if you lose shares you made monies there should not be any frustrations on this and Snake I know you you will not others may. I am not saying this to have people scared and not sell--for heavens sake you make profit take it what did you lose as long as you still hold a good position. If it runs you made more monies on what you hold if it crashes--$1.07 to .72 .35!!!! you will laugh and can buy back equal amounts sold pocket the rest in monies or buy all worth of the difference if you see this is the right thing to do. There are just so many possibilities of things you just have to find what is worthwhile to you and follow your own plan.
Looking forward to seeing this finally burst and nursing my last handful. Good luck all.