RE:RE:RE:RE:It’s gonna be a great year!!!You can't stand Bitcoin? Good, because now we're part crypto mining company! Yea, that changes the fundamentals for me tremendously. Furthermore, the interview was a whole lot of more of the same. Bryson deliberately and stubbornly kept his answers void of any concrete details, figures, timeframes, or expected revenues or profit margins, didn't dispel rumours of a merger that's not going to happen, but had no problem exploiting the rumors with vague, legally non-binding statements, to keep shareholders in the dark. The real telling part was when he suggested that people being critical had an alterior motive, which to me, introduced the notion of manipulation (if disgruntled shareholders are now legitimate targets for suspecting alterior motives, then its fair game to suspect Bryson as well) behind the company's efforts. Didn't sit right with me. He argued that people, concerned about the very real share depreciation, lack of measured deliverables, revenue, as we as liquidity to hold the company afloat during these 'supply chain disruption', etc, are being unreasonable in their expectations, but gave no concrete description of what those expectations were, while utilizing that intentional vagueness to discredit objective criticism of the company's lack of performance. Being a survivor of trauma and abuse, I don't take kindly to being gaslit. And I know it when I see it. Bad move, Bryson.