RE:SlopeWith it being the underlying structure rising shorewards and not only the Eocene Paleocene deposits above resulting in the change in water depth at Kawa vs Haimara it would be favorable in having the continuity of the Campanian ,the Santonian,the Turonian and source rock all the way under Kawa with the pressure to thermally crack source rock being relatively constant (variance weight due to difference in composition of of the Eocene Paleocene overburden) and the cooking time being from the time of Eocene Paleocene to now for what ever is contained in Kawa's reservoirs. So with Kawa depth being around the mid point for all the wells at B58 and accounting for the 1.45 to 1.7 degree slope ..then agreeing on it being the underlying structure rising and hoping that the Eocene -Paleocene deposits sat there long enough to thermally crack what is below to release hydrocarbons I would say we should have a Sapakara to Kawaskwasi size deposit at Kawa with oil quality in the range of Keskesi and something more in line with Sapakara at the other proximal formation on the North Corentyne block west of Kawa 1