RE:RE:Vugular almost got vulgar Dirk, from what I have read from your posts you are an intelligent person. Which may get in your way from time to time.
On this particular point of what OCM stated originally and subsequently clarified you are blinded by your own hasty retort. I am no drilling specialist or expert in the field, but it is plain as day as to what was said and the context does not allow for confusion. He was highlighting a known outcome based on the uncertain activities at Kawa-1, which I am sure were spawned from Dragonfly's report of increased supply boat activity. To use your own metaphor of Schrdinger's cat, the quantum superposition in the minds of us not in the loop that accounted for the activity was losses, the running of casing, or a fat Indian investor each equally occurring at the same time but not all being the correct outcome without knowing what was happening on the rig floor. If you or anyone else does know, chime in, otherwise this whole tete-a-tete is not worth the word count and is just a pissing match over hypotheticals.
I am not one to readily try to mediate ignorance, but as I find the technical knowledge of OCM, and frankly yourself (save for the metaphorical presentations you provide), invaluable and beneficial to the banter on this board, I would hate to lose either of your insights (flawed or otherwise) or distrust the candour you provide.