PyroGenesis Inc T.PYR

Alternate Symbol(s): PYRGF

PyroGenesis Inc., formerly PyroGenesis Canada Inc., is a Canada-based high-tech company. The Company is engaged in the design, development, manufacture and commercialization of advanced plasma processes and sustainable solutions which reduce greenhouse gases (GHG). The Company has created proprietary, patented and advanced plasma technologies that are used in four markets: iron ore palletization, aluminum, waste management, and additive manufacturing. It provides engineering and manufacturing expertise, contract research, as well as turnkey process equipment packages to the defense, metallurgical, mining, additive manufacturing (including 3D printing), oil and gas, and environmental industries. Its products and services include plasma atomized metal powders, aluminum and zinc dross recovery, waste management, plasma torches, and innovation/custom process development. It offers PUREVAP, which is a high purity metallurgical grade silicon and solar grade silicon from quartz.

TSX:PYR - Post by User

PyroGenesis Inc > Torch

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Comment by Yajneon Dec 01, 2021 11:50pm

235 Views

Post# 34188493

RE:RE:RE:Torch

Totally agree Casavantsghost and Magbeach. I think there is a silver lining though. I can't believe that some of those multi-billion$ co's will be applying for "4" or single digit numbers of torches. They will be trying to maximize the GHG they receive and therefore are more likely to place a much larger torch order than they were initially anticipating...all to maximize their GHG grant(s). This is the trade-off for the delays, and I think PYR suggests exactly that in their MD&A. It's worth reading again, from MD&A:

PyroGenesis expects that the previously mentioned government initiatives, geared to stimulating their respective economies by promoting and funding environmental technologies and infrastructure projects, will only serve to increase interest in PyroGenesis’ plasma torch offerings. However, this could delay the onset of contracts as potential clients seek government support for large initiatives.

Casavantsghost wrote:
100% with you on this and so we are at the behest of the purchaser's at this point.

For me, it is semantics. It doesn't change what the company has in solutions for these companies.

If folks cannot understand this, I don't know what else to say. You either believe in what you own in the future of what this company has positioned itself to be at this unique place and time, or you don't and should just walk away.

I do not like subsidies but that is not my call either so if I am the benefactor of such policy.. so be it. I'm not going to cry.. lol

at 58, I have resigned to the potential that will take as long as it will take. If not in my lifetime, then it becomes legacy for my lovely and my kids. What is evident though is: It will be a monster of a company and my heirs will enjoy the fruits if I do not and that is ok.

I own what I know, knowing full well what I own.

Peter's hands are tied at this point. It's not an easy dance but some day there will be dancing in the streets.

"Old Holder".. politics aside.. I would love to toss a beer back with you and thank you some day..
Yes.. I keep up.. I know this is you.. lol

Magbeach123 wrote: If the company that is purchasing the torches (and foregoes the grants) walks away from free or subsidized monies how does that look from a shareholder fiduciary standpoint? I would not overlook the grants or carbon credits, etc. it could have a lot to do with the timing or hesidency to taking a dive into the deep end of the pool IMO