RE:RE:Huge Stockhouse Editorial Coverage
of course they do why should they not get paid for their time and space? Do you work for free? Now as to other comments slamming paid articles well if somebody advertises what are they trying to do? Create business right? So what is wrong with that? And to your point who works for free? So people who are against paid advertising which is it? Get coverage which is neutral and without taking payment yet these people have to make their living so how is the promotion ever free? I roll my eyes when people say all this stuff which doesnt make any sense whatsoever. Now assume people are objective and dont take any payment from companies than they will be paid to analyze stock for their companies and those companies make recommendations and grow in reputation for being really good at their assessment so how many companies are like that and will they bother looking at pennies small caps? Anyways I said people should check it to see if there is anything extra in addition to what we as shareholders know. But here is something to keep in mind if there are tons of things we already know I didnt read it because when I took a fast peak it seems that way people need to understand that the publication is not necessarily meant for us but for those who dont know of the company and if people dont see from this perspective they will say what the hell!??? Why is the company wasting monies with this we already know this well yeah but a broader other segment of people who havent heard about this company and who these articles are more appropriately targeted to soon to know the company because of this. So this is meant to keep bringing more blood investors and interest and nothing wrong with that. It takes money to make money:-)