RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Look aroundFirstly it doesn't have to be one shareholder holding the 10% position but can include a group of shareholders holding 10% or more.
I've been to many AGM's including those held by CRE and there is usually a lot of pontificating from management and not much constructive discussion. Special Meetings can be constructive in the sense that real issues/concerns are brought forward by shareholders and hopefully taken to heart by the board/mangement and action takes place. If the said board and management are hostile and refuse to listen to the shareholders then the shareholders can and have taken things to the next level.
There have been many genuine concerns put forward on this board in decisions that have been made and a breakdown of trust with the company . The "You can take your ball and go home'' statement rings true in some cases but not the investment world. In this case we have invested money in an asset/project that we feel has immense value that isn't being reflected for various reasons some of which are quite obvious.
When Haber entered the picture I breathed a sigh of relief thinking that the business portion of CRE would benefit greatly from his presence. It's quite obvious that it's business as usual and not much has changed and I find it quite odd that Haber as president is hardly ever seen or heard.
In closing I think as shareholders of CRE it's quite healthy for us to have honest and open discussion about concerns we may have especially with the lack of communication from the company itself. I have learned much from everyone on this board.