Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Auxico Resources Canada Inc AUXIF


Primary Symbol: C.AUAG

Auxico Resources Canada Inc. is a Canadian company engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties in Colombia and Bolivia. The Company is focused on the development of properties and projects hosting critical minerals and high-value metals, including niobium, tantalum, platinum group metals, such as platinum and iridium, and rare earth elements. The Company holds mineral and surface rights to the Minastyc Property located in the municipality of Puerto Carreno. It has surface rights to over 1,482 hectares of land between two adjoining properties: Agualinda and the Minastyc property. The Company has an 85% interest in Empresa Minera El Benton S.R.L., which holds the mining title and rights to the El Benton Mine and adjacent Monte Verde concessions.


CSE:AUAG - Post by User

Comment by checkingiton Dec 07, 2021 8:52am
82 Views
Post# 34205489

RE:RE:Total Rare Earth Oxide Content grading 59.70 %

RE:RE:Total Rare Earth Oxide Content grading 59.70 %Should consider the distribution of the samples as well as the results and what that means for a potential resource. The sampling methods, laboratories used, analytical methods used are questionable and poorly presented. Makes one wonder why? The distribution of the samples and their type also not represented. Talking about the distance between samples and inplying continuity is very misleading. If these are paleochannels then their continuity laterally and verticall cannot be established with a few point sources. I dont believe the companies QP has any knowledge of real geology given the reporting thus far.
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>