RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Shareprice speaks fori itselfThat is an almost olympic logical leap. So if someone can't infer your meaning, then they are speaking word salad to please themselves? And then you follow that up with some hallucinations and mind reading statements. Has this been a useful communication strategy for you?
HaulJockey wrote: If you can't infer from my statement my meaning, you're talking word salad to please yourself.
Pumpers usually combine name calling and dismissal of facts along with their word salad, I'm sure that's to come. SamRothstein wrote: The only question you asked in your below post was whether anyone remembered the Happy Caps deal, which I assumed by the "remember that one" was a rhetorical question, and clearly I do remember it which is why I commented on it. Was I supped to say, "Yes I remember the Happy Caps deal". And then I asked you a question, which was clearly not a rhetorical question, but a question about your strange assertion on the price paid for Happy Caps, and you replied with below non sequitor. I would say physican heal thyself.
HaulJockey wrote: You couldn't answer a straight question with a ruler. Always dodging the facts to suit yourself.., like now.
No one wants to hear your word salad. SamRothstein wrote: Huh? Are you saying that they paid less for Happy Caps because called them out on fact that you didn't think it was good deal?
HaulJockey wrote: What did it for me was the little mushroom garage they bought in Nova Scotia, remember that one? They still bought it but if they hadn't been called out on what it really was, who knows what they would have "paid" for it.
HandsOffMydata1 wrote: Regardless of any poster predicting it..How can you spin this disaster as anything positive.Mgt appears to have mislead everyone imo