Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

American Creek Resources Ltd V.AMK

Alternate Symbol(s):  ACKRF

American Creek Resources Ltd. is a Canada-based junior mineral exploration company, which is engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties, principally for precious metal deposits. The Company’s projects include Treaty Creek and Austruck-Bonanza. The Treaty Creek Project covers approximately 114 square km in the Skeena Mining District of northern British Columbia and is situated approximately 70 km north of Stewart. The Austruck-Bonanza Property is located within the Kamloops Mining Division 53 kilometers north-west of the city of Kamloops in south central British Columbia. The Austruck-Bonanza Property is underlain by Devonian to Triassic Harper Ranch formation comprised of fine grade sedimentary rocks including mudstone and shale and includes basaltic volcanics. The Company holds 100% interest in the Austruck-Bonanza Property and 20% interest in the Treaty Creek project.


TSXV:AMK - Post by User

Comment by CharlieWaffleson Dec 07, 2021 12:30pm
94 Views
Post# 34206726

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Level 2

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Level 2
Looking at the Boards buy/sell activity might be useful, wouldn't net selling and no buying give the impression a TO isn't near term? If buying was to occur then we could speculate about it either being a vote of confidence or something brewing?
 
On the other hand 70M oz is such a gigantic number, I still have a hard time just getting over the shock value. 
 
I was thinking about numbers this past week. Trying to somewhat check my own expectations and just see out of X number of years what could be the value created with an expanding resource. 
 
First, what price, I say $100 CAD, if it's better we still win :) Also the subject of price is a HUGE one, just so many variables so I like to keep it simple.
 
Next how many more OZ can you assume going forward? Here at the moment that number for me isn't reliable enough. Once this year's drilling is added to the Resource then assumptions going forward might be a little less wide in end results.  Now some expect a double even 50% more would be fantastic. I started with 10M oz. 
 
But this is what 10M yearly looks like if you assume $100
 
10Moz X AMK 20% = 2Moz X $100 = $200,000,000 Potential value added to AMK
If you assume max dilution 10% a year in 3 years that means 200M is 600M with 1/3 loss to dilution so about $400M
 
 
Let's say 5 Years X 2Moz - 10M oz X $100 = $1,000,000,000
If you assume max dilution 10% a year in 5 years that means 1B is about 400M or again $1 TO assumed today would be around $.40 in 5 years and if resource was 3X to 15M then $1.20
 
Although this is a worse case scenario it's still open to be seen as to who will end up with this part and also keep in mind the best part about TC besides the gold is having 3 companies not only involved but 3 companies that are all tradable. Options are always great and TC is full of them. 
 
As an example I see AMK needing to move up 50% to meet up with TUD but if you assume 3Y max dilution of 1/3 then retail is fully priced relative to TUD 
 
 
Now let's spin this around a little as a reference. In 5Y 10M more oz let's call what we have now 5M oz this means 3X in ressources and if you're right about a doubling this year then you just cut 2.5 years from my numbers. 
 
One other thing from this year's results is how the mineralized areas seem to be popping up like Friday nights Popcorn. I say this because my understanding a few years ago was that TUD had their foot to the floor so doubling drilling didn't seem possible but if this blows up in all directions I'm curious to see how TUD deals with the size and perhaps this could increase total drills used as they spread out? One thing is for sure with TUD is that they WANT MORE DRILLING! If we also start seeing drill rig counts increase that would be amazing for us and bad for anyone else needing Drills lol 
 
Why so quiet Lackeys? 
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>