RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:ceo.ca signs you are being acquired...interesting read It may be easy to point the finger at Fidelity due to their recent accumulation of shares, similar to how others used to poke Mackie back in the day when they were publicly accumulating shares, however, the truth is always stranger than fiction and Charlie Chan is best suited for this commentary. He/She/It has a more in debt perspective on this topic than myself.
Are you suggesting Fidelity is "net buying" under their brokerage and paying extra fees to "net sell" via Anon when the price is lower? Why would they sell at a loss over the recent 2 months of trading and sabotage their own trading position, unless they were using another brokerage as hitmen trading under anon in unison. Similar to Bank of America and Merrill Lynch, last name Lynch for a reason.
Fidelity is known for holding positions longer term, but what do I know. Maybe they are hedging their positions.
Fidelity is the largest net buyer of Tinley's shares over a longer duration than 2 months, I wouldn't throw them under the bus as shorting simultaneously, but what do I know.
"I know that I know nothing."
Harmanny wrote: Finally someone who knows how to read a trading terminal. sneakysneaky can you run those numbers for the 2 months before the block trade? I think Fidelity is the largest buyer. Big institutions like that trade in and out of their positions all day.