Tinley Beverage Company Inc C.TNY

Alternate Symbol(s): TNYBF

The Tinley Beverage Company Inc., together with its subsidiaries, manufactures a line of non-alcoholic, cannabis-infused beverages for use in California, United States and in Ontario, Canada. The Company also manufactures cannabis-infused beverages for contract manufacturing clients. It offers terpene and cannabis-infused non-alcoholic Tinley's '27 and Tinley's Tonics products, for distribution to licensed dispensaries and home delivery channels in California. The Beckett's Classics and Beckett's '27 lines of non-alcoholic, terpene-infused non-cannabis versions of these formulations are available in select mainstream food, beverage, and specialty retailers in the United States as well as in select grocery and specialty stores in Canada. Its subsidiaries include Hemplify Inc., Algonquin Springs Beverage Management LLC, Beckett’s Tonics California Inc., Beckett's Tonics Canada Inc., Tinley's Canada Inc., and Lakewood Libations Inc.

CSE:TNY - Post by User

Tinley Beverage Company Inc > ceo.ca signs you are being acquired...interesting read

<< Previous

Bullboard Posts

Next >>

Comment by cosinus180on Dec 08, 2021 1:46pm

134 Views

Post# 34211283

RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:ceo.ca signs you are being acquired...interesting read

Or... someone who wants to buy it out for pennies on the dollar. Maybe someone buys some shares once in awhile in order to look like they have skin in the game? Or an entity that has an ace showing and holds the future of tny moving forward..just thinking out loud here..hmmmm

Redwine12345 wrote: Hi Charlie, thanks for the post. Have question for you.
You are saying :

Forget about tallying up the number of brokerages that are net seller’s vs the number of brokerages that are net buyers. They are all one and the same using a different name to transfer shares and keep their positions the same, all the while manipulating the market to fit their agenda. In Tinley's case, it is obvious that their agenda is to short TNY into bankruptcy and they have done one hell of a good job so far.

In another paragraph, you recognize the fact that they own substantial amount of shares.

In order for them to be profitable, the amount of shares shorted should be larger than amount of shares the have. But this is not the case. There is hardly any shares shorted compared to the outstanding shares.

Trading for the sake of pushing company into bancruptcy doesn't make sense, unless they are going to be paid by someone who wants to see them gone.

Any comments please