RE:RE:RE:Why faster?Shlinker_ wrote: Hmmm, really? We don't know if DMs technology is actually good, and therefore desired. Appears to me that the technology isn't as good as we hope. We would see far more deals come through. There may be only one decent process they offer, hence the signings to date, we don't know. Too many questions with this play,. And where is this so called 40M contract? We're we punted to curb MG?
Let's see: slamming DM's technology with no real evidence to the contrary; downplaying the contracts signed to date and neglecting to mention the huge corporate names that are DM clients;
saying there are too many questions, but not mentioning what they are... I think there is only one real question: "Should we add Shlinker to the troll list"?