Charlie_Chan wrote: Harmanny wrote: That's also who anon could be because brokers buying from themselves is wash trading (illegal). If anon is Fidelity then that's good because they have huge coin and run up the stock big time every once in a while. Watch and see...
Interesting that you mentioned that brokers buying from themselves is wash trading which is illegal. Yup, it sure is. And so is a great deal of the daily goings on with the "trading" (cough cough) on a micro cap marijuana stock trading on the CSE. The more you watch the daily activity of TNY and other penny stocks, you start to conclude that this casino is so fixed and the tables so off center that the bad guys will always win.
Look at the past 6 months of Anonymous trading below. They netted a loss of 17.6 million shares. This was an average 6 months worth of disposal of shares. Using that as a normal, you realise that they had netted a loss of 35 million shares (est.) in the past year. Multiply this "normal" by the last 4 years and it indicates that Anonymous has sold net, more shares of TNY than what the present shares outstanding of this Company.
So, what the hell is going on? We can only guess, but using logic it suggests that Anonymous has to be "fed" shares from other brokerage houses who are all part of a daisy chain that actually do have some ownership of shares, but who incestuously move them in and out to create a market that allows them to completely manipulate the share price with fictitious accounts using Fidelity (formerly Mackie) as the prime feeder, and the usual brokerages that also are part of this swindle. Prior to the ATS, it was reasonably easy to keep a finger on the pulse of this daily scam, however the smoke and mirrors that are prevalent in the background now are as clear as mud when you try to scratch beneath the surface.
Forget about tallying up the number of brokerages that are net seller’s vs the number of brokerages that are net buyers. They are all one and the same using a different name to transfer shares and keep their positions the same, all the while manipulating the market to fit their agenda. In Tinley's case, it is obvious that their agenda is to short TNY into bankruptcy and they have done one hell of a good job so far.
In closing, these are solely my conclusions based on observing the trading on a daily basis for over 5 years. Some posters have been offended that I might suggest that there is illegality occurring, and if so, that the "powers to be" would make sure they cease and desist. The "powers to be" have the same access to info as I, and I have no doubt that this is far from a pristine platform to conduct a business of transferring shares from willing sellers to willing buyers, when the sellers and the buyers are the same entity.
Below is 6 months of house positions. Examine the net loss of "Anonymous" shares and try to figure out which brokerages are feeding Anonymous. It won't take you long to figure this one out! With the exception of Fidelity, the feeding brokerages are all large legitimate Canadian banks that most retail investors use as their trading brokers, however I would suggest that over 80% of the volume from these legit brokers are non retail and all part of the chain.
JMHO, of course
| House Positions for Tinley's- From June 8-Dec 8--(Incestuous feeding to Anon) |
| 22 Fidelity | 8,484,000 | 1,527,553 | 0.18 | 212,676 | 39,669 | 0.187 | 8,271,324 | -1,487,884 |
| 9 BMO Nesbitt | 3,345,570 | 555,709 | 0.166 | 1,319,149 | 279,226 | 0.212 | 2,026,421 | -276,483 |
| 2 RBC | 7,220,991 | 1,376,880 | 0.191 | 5,407,299 | 1,064,618 | 0.197 | 1,813,692 | -312,262 |
| 85 Scotia | 4,821,034 | 937,033 | 0.194 | 3,327,750 | 721,728 | 0.217 | 1,493,284 | -215,305 |
| 80 National Bank | 2,531,528 | 480,877 | 0.19 | 1,277,499 | 243,170 | 0.19 | 1,254,029 | -237,707 |
| 79 CIBC | 5,070,887 | 995,803 | 0.196 | 3,841,705 | 820,655 | 0.214 | 1,229,182 | -175,148 |
| 89 Raymond James | 1,249,533 | 190,469 | 0.152 | 529,991 | 95,655 | 0.18 | 719,542 | -94,814 |
| 7 TD Sec | 8,092,864 | 1,535,244 | 0.19 | 7,410,759 | 1,388,507 | 0.187 | 682,105 | -146,737 |
| 124 Questrade | 1,386,212 | 279,706 | 0.202 | 788,997 | 178,259 | 0.226 | 597,215 | -101,447 |
| 88 Credential | 835,290 | 126,973 | 0.152 | 430,142 | 69,610 | 0.162 | 405,148 | -57,363 |
| 14 ITG | 482,315 | 110,840 | 0.23 | 125,959 | 20,244 | 0.161 | 356,356 | -90,596 |
| 13 Instinet | 1,134,000 | 201,106 | 0.177 | 980,500 | 157,254 | 0.16 | 153,500 | -43,852 |
| 70 Manulife | 100,700 | 15,898 | 0.158 | 15,115 | 2,529 | 0.167 | 85,585 | -13,369 |
| 68 Leede | 84,735 | 14,548 | 0.172 | 20,300 | 3,492 | 0.172 | 64,435 | -11,056 |
| 83 Mackie | 55,000 | 14,300 | 0.26 | 0 | | 55,000 | -14,300 |
| 300 CSE Buy-In | 30,000 | 12,000 | 0.40 | 0 | | 30,000 | -12,000 |
| 28 BBS | 33,520 | 6,114 | 0.182 | 7,700 | 1,874 | 0.243 | 25,820 | -4,240 |
| 18 Echelon | 3,882,576 | 388,257 | 0.10 | 3,882,576 | 388,257 | 0.10 | 0 | 0 |
| 76 Industrial Alliance | 9,000 | 2,115 | 0.235 | 10,380 | 1,323 | 0.127 | -1,380 | -792 |
| 19 Desjardins | 492,017 | 94,480 | 0.192 | 497,250 | 107,996 | 0.217 | -5,233 | 13,516 |
| 39 Merrill Lynch | 68,775 | 20,235 | 0.294 | 85,129 | 26,220 | 0.308 | -16,354 | 5,985 |
| 57 Interactive | 0 | | 25,000 | 5,750 | 0.23 | -25,000 | 5,750 |
| 62 Haywood | 0 | | 31,200 | 12,390 | 0.397 | -31,200 | 12,390 |
| 59 PI | 16,754 | 2,823 | 0.168 | 49,454 | 14,302 | 0.289 | -32,700 | 11,479 |
| 48 Laurentian | 22,000 | 6,674 | 0.303 | 66,000 | 14,117 | 0.214 | -44,000 | 7,443 |
| 74 GMP | 0 | | 89,999 | 17,825 | 0.198 | -89,999 | 17,825 |
| 36 Latimer | 59,659 | 12,124 | 0.203 | 157,887 | 32,768 | 0.208 | -98,228 | 20,644 |
| 33 Canaccord | 1,154,393 | 295,364 | 0.256 | 1,655,150 | 378,000 | 0.228 | -500,757 | 82,636 |
| 55 Velocity | 0 | | 725,000 | 237,814 | 0.328 | -725,000 | 237,814 |
| 1 Anonymous | 9,460,922 | 1,841,779 | 0.195 | 27,153,709 | 4,721,739 | 0.174 | -17,692,787 | 2,879,960 |
| TOTAL | 60,124,275 | 11,044,904 | 0.184 | 60,124,275 | 11,044,991 | 0.184 | 0 | 87 |