RE:RE:Nash tag conference I think option 4 is the correct answer
Option 4 .....All of the above!!!
SABBOBCAT wrote: You could look at this in a few ways, 1) they couldnt get a presentation slot because no-one likes them or the unconventional path, 2) MDGL is the lead sponsor and doesnt want to highlight the competition, 3) They are far enough down a partnership path that they dont want need to pay up to market and/or don't want to piss off the new partner by shopping it around further.
I'd like to think it is option 3, but realistically it is more likely that TH is to cheap to pay for access at these types of events and is unable to drum up the interest to justify an invitation to present.
Bucknelly21 wrote: How can a phase 3 Nash company like Thtx get lost in the mix of 2-3 others?!? They apparently are going to a Nash tag conference in Utah and aren't even presenting? They have a booth lol so embarrassing how much they botched the Nash opportunity