RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Go SHORTY, it's your birthday! Stockmoves, interesting that you don't consider me a long. I have held shares in Treaty Creek since before it was discovered. In other words, I have held shares in Teuton before the turn of the century. I would say that is a pretty "looonnnnngg" position.
If you are specifically referring to AMK, you are somewhat correct. While I fully believe there will be a massive mine on the Treaty Creek property someday, I don't hold long term positions in AMK. I do purchase shares in AMK for swing positions when I consider the price grossly undervalued. However, I prefer to hold my long term positions primarly in the other two partners.
Also, to be clear, I do not hold short positions. I prefer to just "sit-out" when I think the stock or markets are in bear markets.
Stockmoves1 wrote: Shall I chime in my 2cts worth.... Rockport isn't what I consider a long but does it with a little class.. that being said I felt the same way as H&L many times.. When you trade a stock its one thing and that was stated fairly that you cant afford to lose capital.. problem with that is when a stock doesn't perform the way you expect one easily turns on it... Most of us longs here are in thru thick and thin.. yes our positions will alter from time to time but our view of the final outcome remians in place.... So I do see the reason what was said... not trying to create waves here but rather presenting the facts.