Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Lanesborough Real Estate Investment Trust V.LRT.UN

Lanesborough Real Estate Investment Trust is a Canada-based real estate investment trust. The investment properties of the Company are separated into three operating segments: Fort McMurray Properties, Other Investment Properties, and Held for Sale and/or Sold Properties. Fort McMurray Properties includes eight properties. Other Investment Properties include two properties. Held for Sale and/or Sold Properties includes sold properties: five properties. The property portfolio of the Company consists of approximately 11 rental properties, encompassing 10 multi-unit residential properties, including the unsold condominium units at Lakewood Townhome.


TSXV:LRT.UN - Post by User

Post by merriamon Dec 15, 2021 9:43pm
133 Views
Post# 34235263

Are the debentures secured or not?

Are the debentures secured or not?This question came up here recently.  The answer is that they are secured.  It is in their name.  See the information circular for the meeting on Sedar where they are called by their full name:

5.00% SERIES G REDEEMABLE SUBORDINATED SECURED DEBENTURES.

You will lose that security if the deal goes through.  That is one reason why I am voting no.

They are subordinated, which means that they stand behind other secured debt in the hierarchy of payments in the event of a liquation (which might be in our future).  But importantly, they stand ahead of unsecured liabilities, which could include regular trade debts (like utility bills), corporate credit card debt, salaries due, unfunded pension liabilities, unpaid bonuses and golden handshakes, and so on.  Needless to say, in a liquidation, secured debt stands far ahead of the trust units we are slated to receive.

If this proposal is accepted, it might be to management's advantage to allow LRT to go into receivership.  If they could convince a court that they are insolvent (shouldn't be too hard), then they could propose a restructing where the remaining secured debt holders exchange their debt for equity and the existing equity/unit holders are eliminated.

This site describes the debentures position in the hierarchy of liabilities:

https://apps.tmx.com/TSXVenture/TSXVentureHttpController?GetPage=NoticesContents&PO_ID=1065326&NOTICE_ID=235717&CORRECTION_FLG=N&HC_FLAG1=checked
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>