Pertinent information for all.I'll reiterate that "if I had the money readily available, I would be buying every single GRA share which is made available at these price points and perhaps much lower.
I said, "I'd be pleasantly surprised should the share price be supported; that is unlikely though."
Clearly, I am pleasantly surprized at the Globe & Mail's 'minions' for not actually putting out a 'hit piece' article attempting to kick and beat NanoXplore as a company and the company's share price while it was down, so to speak.
Some person and/or persons over at the Globe & Mail must already have taken up a very low priced 'vested interest" in NanoXplore.
Quite obviously, I am also 'pleasantly surprized' that NanoXplore's share price managed to stay above $6.00 pers share today. I was expecting much worse and that has not, as yet , happened; and perhaps may not happen going forward. We'll see.
As I said current GRA share price points are, in my opinion, a sreaming buy.
The equities analyst quoted in the globe & Mail article certainly had a positive take to share with the investing public at large.
I certainly don't expect to be disappointed by the coming developments related to the Co-owned VoltaXplore enterprise vehicle.
During the days, weeks and months ahead, GRA investors would do well to take note of the soon to be announced provincial and federal governments Private - Pulic Partnership supported investment initiatives. These will be undertaken initiatives in support of 'comprehensively' assisting to expedite the build out of and sustaining of another Canadian link to what will be a North American wide battery materials development and manufacturing link added to a North American battery cells manufacturing supply chain.
For NanoXplore, a 'OEM partnership' or 'partnerships' and a secured forward looking 'purchase agreement' or 'agreements' would be critical in supporting VoltaXplore's ability to secure the financial capacity which would be required to build out, support and sustain much needed development and manufacturing capabilities.
The VoltaXplore enterprise must, for the most part, be able to financially support itself going forward and must be well capable of generating a decent initial rate of return on deployed capital provided by it's co-owning corporations, Martinrea International Inc and NanoXplore Inc.
To reiterate something which I stated within a previous post, I am certain that by now NanoXplore's team have ensured to have the company's proprietary battery cells chemistry clearly established, tested and validated by one of the most reputable and globally recognized independent third party testing and validation laboratories.
My personal wish, and I have no factual basis to suggest that NanoXplore representatives have indeed submitted for testing and validation to this particular independent third party laboratory facility, would be that the battery cells which had ben tested and validated for NanoXplore had been sent to Jeff Dahn's Dalhousie Battery Lab.
As a back up alternative to the Dalhousie lab, I would greatly appreciate the NanoXplore developed battery cells having been sent to a independent third party testing and validation lab housed within the research and development centre operated by a certain South Korean based company named L&F Co Ltd. and/or it's 'affiliated' anodes and cathodes Battery Materials company, which I'll refrain from emphasizing for now.
FWI:
L&F Co Ltd.is one of three South Korean based developers, manufacturers and suppliers of 'proprietary' anodes and cathodes battery materials, the other two being Posco Chemicals, the largest capacity contractor and Ecopro BM, having a larger 'present' production capacity than L&F Co. Ltd.
Amongst other quite capable and high quality producers globally, the three aforementioned South Korean based 'battery materials' developers and manufacturer companies supply either of SK Innovations, LG Chem, Samsung, Panasonic and CATL the specifically formulated and 'proprietary' anodes and cathodes materials which comprise the very battery cells utilized by Tesla, Ford, GM, Stellantis, VW, BMW, Solid Power Inc., etc.
Sufficed to say that if your going to most seriously compete, survive and financially thrive as a integral participant and battery materials developer, manufacturer and supplier operating within the ever expanding North American and global battery cells manufacturing industry; you better know well in advance and without a doubt who your competitors are and definitely know who your potential partners, end customers, joint venturing 'partners' and your more than capable 'financial backers' are going to be.
Does Mr. Soroush Nazarpour know? You can bet your assets he certainly does.
NanoXplore Long and Strong!
There is more which I'll save for a later date.