RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Trading review from July 27 to today - Where is Paradigm? !! literally only you and the band of pumpers here think 60% enrolment will happen in 2022. Now if you really believe it or you have an angle is a different story.
their lack of credibility is the reason the market cap is where it is. Because not only did people know this shortly after they finished the financing but they also felt cheated. It's hard to trust them with anything if even the obvious stuff is a lie.
BayStreetWild wrote:
you're a actually so clueless that they should use you as a textbook example of why people need to pass an aptitude test to participate in the stock market. But than again how would the 1% make money.
the anonymous selling is 99% institutional and high net worth selling through their brokerages. The people from the financing or people taking short positions. It didn't take a rocket scientist to see the company was talking smack and wasn't delivering on the promises. I said it in July... you think people making $200k a year and qualifying as high net worth are as dumb as you to not be able to read simple words on a page to discern if the company is telling the truth or not? Maybe they convinced you... but not anyone else on the planet that graduated even from community college.
mercedesman wrote:
I was just trying to debunk your theory about a rogue "hedge fund" or the sudden sale of 10 million shares by "disillusioned investors" in concert with the underpriced financing.
BTW on the disillusioned investor thing, it's curious they all decided to sell their shares under the cloak of darkness, using the anonymous house.
I would have preferred that you use the the story about a large shareholder croaking with the estate selling his or her shares - willie-nillie without regard to price. For more credibility than your story, you are welcome to use that one the next time.
The fact that you throw in the towel, can't debate the issue, nor defend your position, tells me everything that I need to know.
MM
BayStreetWild wrote:
I lose brain cells just reading your posts. What a waste of time. The share price will tell it like it is. As it has been. No amount of the pump rooms back and fourth softballs will fix it. But you guys keep justifying your salary. I get it.
mercedesman wrote:
Nice bit of back peddling on the Hedge fund thing
which has now morphed into...
"it's a compounded problem and hitting from many different angles."
whatever that means ?
"Disillusioned investors because of unreliable management, tax loss selling, and potential predatory fund action. These things have to fix themselves one by one."
so the stock that has virtually zero retail following all of a sudden, developed disillusioned investors overnight ? 10 million shares worth? Or do we go back to the vaguely defined and mysterious "potential predatory fund" ? If so, who and why?
Now I could actually imagine a few opportunistic tax loss sellers playing along, taking advantage of the several month lull in enrollment ( while the Rolodex was under repair) which unfortunately seems to have coincided with an under- priced, unsupported (by PR) financing.
Now what I think we can agree on is the fact " that it will eventually sort itself out"
MM