RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:WTI Yup - Husky assets could be summarized as a) offshore (and retail) which AP kept the good and sold/restructured the bad b) diverse if not unwieldy mix of 2nd tier upstream assets which ought to be and are being sold presumably to be replaced by an expansion (or....) of CVE's much better SAGD operations and c) the integrated assets that are being retained and optimized. My only comment is I view the Husky shares as a sort of debt for CVE shareholders, a debt that ought to be repaid to the max before the dividend is increased. It's straightforward - cashflow from operations and asset sales in, cash to buyback CVE shares out.