RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Avg volume on name GrahamB wrote: Renofund wrote: DavidRosenberg wrote: DavidRosenberg wrote:
Renofund wrote: Is just over 50,000 shares. Or about 70K in value traded. DR, explain why some smart money investors would take a position in this name of any meaningful size when it could take weeks if not months to get out?
That's up to you guys that's none of my business in what you want to do with your shares I don't give buy sell or hold advice
cheers
Just 1 big institutional investor could fix share price if they wanted to if there was good results from clinical trials as an example
fsd Pharma has 3 drugs if just 1 of them succeeds could be a game changer for many people
again, you are showing you clearly didnt understand what was asked, which is why you seem blinded by this name. Read the past couple posts again and perhaps it will click. It is a tiny market cap with next to no liquidity ... why would they lock themselves in? LOL. How does this not connect for you? Did you make it chapter 1 in your new investor book you bought online?
On another point, you are all "if's" ... if this, if that. Akin to buying a lottomax and telling people if you win then you will be rich. And then getting mad and calling people bashers when they tell you that is not a strategy to get rich.
again, you are showing you clearly didnt understand what was asked, which is why you seem blinded by this name. Read the past couple posts again and perhaps it will click. It is a tiny market cap with next to no liquidity ... why would they lock themselves in? LOL. How does this not connect for you? Did you make it chapter 1 in your new investor book you bought online?
On another point, you are all "if's" ... if this, if that. Akin to buying a lottomax and telling people if you win then you will be rich. And then getting mad and calling people bashers when they tell you that is not a strategy to get rich.
This is exactly it Reno.
i had a series of posts with him, and it was my conclusion as well.
There is little point in trying to have a rational discussion, when the person you are speaking with cant understand, communicate, or both.
Merry Christmas and Happy Holdiays Graham! Yeah I know what you mean. Over time, I am
coming to realize that perhaps DR is less misleading that originally thought and it is more about a lack of understanding which leads him to mislead. 70% (ish) lack of understanding and 30% still misleading. Sitting on a ton of dead shares (for time being anyway), significant losses, assuming he was buying like he says he was back in the day and is in over his head. Makes sense with all his "if's" ... trying to find and only focusing in on best case scenarios. Makes sense why he finds some larger bio names and thinks the same thing can happen here. Perhaps it can, but life is probabilities ... and thus far, this is a low probability