RE:RE:Less taxes, important when attracting co-packing clientsNot too smart are you Sergio. My position has changed and I am grateful for that as it has saved me a ton of money - thanks for pointing that out again, makes me happy to see in my own words why one does not marry a stock. I sold long ago, and anyone that has an intelligence would have too until management can prove they are executing.
sneakysneaky wrote: lolzz with a cherry on tippy top!
I couldn't have said it better, your tone has changed over the years to compliment you position!
Planetoflimes wrote: I never really thought too much past the lower production cost for Tinley products thanks to the recent change in tax until I glanced over the email to shareholders from today. "We're working to add store listings on the heels of these wins, and continue to be positioned for production in our new Long Beach facility early in the new year. The enhanced production capabilities of this facility, coupled with the new, lower taxes(now among the lowest in the state), will enable us to consummate additional co-packing deals and drive volume of our own products." Mainly looking at the last sentence. What advantage to have a company thank can co-package products at a significantly discount compared to other geographical areas. This change alone should create deals with companies looking to stay competitive.