Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Vermilion Energy Inc T.VET

Alternate Symbol(s):  VET

Vermilion Energy Inc. is a Canada-based international energy producer. The Company seeks to create value through the acquisition, exploration, development, and optimization of producing assets in North America, Europe, and Australia. Its business model emphasizes free cash flow generation and returning capital to investors when economically warranted, augmented by value-adding acquisitions. The Company’s operations are focused on the exploitation of light oil and liquids-rich natural gas conventional and unconventional resource plays in North America and the exploration and development of conventional natural gas and oil opportunities in Europe and Australia. The Company operates through seven geographical segments: Canada, the United States, France, Netherlands, Germany, Ireland, and Australia. In Canada, the Company is a key player in the highly productive Mannville condensate-rich gas play. It holds a 100% working interest in the Wandoo field, offshore Australia.


TSX:VET - Post by User

Comment by Pandoraon Jan 16, 2022 11:39am
269 Views
Post# 34321632

RE:Interesting

RE:Interesting
An excerpt from this weekend's Pinnacle Digest:

The European Union (EU) is now on the verge of including natural gas (albeit on a transitional basis) and nuclear activities in the EU taxonomy.
 
 
Why is this a big deal?
 
 
The taxonomy is a European Commission program designed to facilitate access to capital on favourable terms for environmentally sustainable economic activities within the region.
 
 
Earlier this month, the European Commission released a draft text of the Taxonomy Complementary Delegated Act (CDA) to member states for consultation. World Nuclear News reported that,
 
“The proposed CDA elevates three distinct nuclear energy activities into the taxonomy: demonstration units for advanced nuclear technologies; the construction of new nuclear power plants using best available technologies; and electricity generation from existing nuclear installations.”
 
 
Prior to the document’s release, nuclear power was already making a comeback in certain European jurisdictions. A month ago, the new coalition government of the Netherlands placed nuclear power at the heart of its energy policy. Per World Nuclear News,
 
“…the government said it would provide financial support to the goal of building new nuclear power plants. It outlined EUR50 million (USD56 million) for this in 2023, EUR200 million in 2024 and EUR250 million in 2025.
 
It anticipated that cumulative support for new nuclear would reach EUR5 billion by 2030, while not assuming the power plants would be online by that time.”
 
 
Earlier this week, Thierry Breton, the European Commissioner for the Internal Market, claimed in an interview with Le Journal du Dimanche that a ‘colossal’ US$565 billion of investment in nuclear power will be needed by 2050 if the EU is to hit its carbon neutrality targets. According to the commissioner,
 
“Existing nuclear power plants alone will require 50 billion euros of investment by 2030. And 500 billion by 2050 for new generation ones. This effort represents around 20 billion euros per year.”
 
 
And, although countries like Germany and Belgium plan to phase out nuclear energy, several scenarios have warned that those countries risk missing out on their CO2 emissions targets by a wide margin, and possibly increase their energy dependence if they were to follow through on those policies.
 
 
While Belgium announced that it will go ahead with the phase-out of current nuclear power plants, the country will now turn to Small Modular Nuclear Reactors as a potentially viable future technology. Reuters’ Philip Blenkinsop reported in December that,
 
“Belgium will also invest 100 million euros ($113 million) over four years in research into nuclear power technology, emphasising smaller modular reactors and possibly cooperating with France and the Netherlands.”
 
Cleaner and More Powerful than Renewables?
For years, the United States’ Energy Department has touted nuclear energy as a more powerful and denser source of electricity than any other clean-air source. As stated by the department,
 
“...you would need more than 3 million solar panels to produce the same amount of power as a typical commercial reactor or more than 430 wind turbines (capacity factor not included).”
 
 
It also views nuclear energy as currently the most effective zero-emissions clean energy source in the United States. The government’s website states that by using nuclear power plants,
 
“...the United States avoided more than 476 million metric tons of carbon dioxide emissions in 2019. That’s the equivalent of removing 100 million cars from the road and more than all other clean energy sources combined.”
<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>