RE:RE:RE:RE:Paul Quinn ForcastWell. Welcome to the show. Both options are correct but only one of them provides insight into how to avoid undue risk.
Yes, they do have superior quality timber as a function of knots and grain density. And yes, the supply is "secure" in the conventional sense as it hasn't been meddled with in 20 years. Secure does not mean untouchable. Nor is this a binding agreement right -- these are generic terms that are not protected or enforceable.
So, both are right, but not everyone gets it. And one take supports a relaxed biz as usual approach and they other makes investors share and ready to adapt. Gov't can take that tenure back for any number of reasons. They get paid out,but that can take years and be modest.