BACK on the TABLE,,,,the BRIDGEMARK SCANDAL InvestigationsJust POSTED on SEDAR__the 6 Month Financial Reports__has This REAL GEM
Looks like BOTH the CEO and AFFINOR are ONCE AGAIN on the BCSC Scrutiny eh ????
14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Temporary Order and Notice of Hearing
On March 8, 2018, the Company completed a non-brokered private placement by issuing 24,997,916 units (“Unit”) at a price of $0.16 per Unit for gross proceeds of $3,999,667, all of which was raised under the Consultant Exemption under National Instrument 45-106. A large portion of the funds was paid out in the form of consulting fees as the Company had entered into 14 three-month contracts for consulting services totalling $3,500,000 for accounting, corporate and administrative services, internet marketing, investor relations, merger and acquisition consulting and cannabis consulting. As at May 31, 2018, $175,000 in GST paid on the consulting fees was included in receivables. Of this amount, $47,500 has been recovered from four consultants.
On November 26, 2018, the British Columbia Securities Commission (the “BCSC”) issued a Temporary Order and Notice of Hearing (the “Order”) to respondents, including the Company, pursuant to Section 161 of the Securities Act (the “Act”) advising that a hearing would be held under section 161 (3) of the Act to determine whether to extend the temporary order under Section 161. The BCSC’s concern is that the named issuers paid the majority of the private placement proceeds received, including those noted above, back when little or no consulting services had been or were intended to be performed and that this conduct is abusive to the capital markets. Considering the length of time to hold a hearing under section 161 (a) of the Act, the BCSC issued the following temporary orders under section 161 (1)(c): (i) that the
exemption under section 2.24 of National Instrument 45-106 does not apply to the named issuers for a distribution to a consultant; and (ii) it does not apply to any issuer listed on the Canadian Securities Exchange for distribution to named respondents.
At a hearing held on December 7, 2018, the executive director asked the BCSC to extend the temporary orders, which were to expire on December 11, 2018, until a hearing was held and a decision rendered. The temporary orders were extended at the completion of the hearing until a decision was issued on this application.
On January 15, 2019, the BCSC issued its decision with respect to the temporary orders. With respect to the Company, it found that the executive director had not provided prima facie evidence of having engaged in conduct contrary to the public interest and, accordingly, the temporary orders were not extended. It was also concluded that it is in the public interest to not proceed with the hearing until the BCSC investigation has concluded.
During the year ended May 31, 2021, the Notice of Hearing was amended to remove the Company as a respondent and there is no current proceeding against the Company. The BCSC held the right to re-institute proceedings in the future and the Company received notice of the re-institution on January 26, 2022 and is the process of reviewing its position with legal counsel.