Join today and have your say! It’s FREE!

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Please Try Again
{{ error }}
By providing my email, I consent to receiving investment related electronic messages from Stockhouse.

or

Sign In

Please Try Again
{{ error }}
Password Hint : {{passwordHint}}
Forgot Password?

or

Please Try Again {{ error }}

Send my password

SUCCESS
An email was sent with password retrieval instructions. Please go to the link in the email message to retrieve your password.

Become a member today, It's free!

We will not release or resell your information to third parties without your permission.
Quote  |  Bullboard  |  News  |  Opinion  |  Profile  |  Peers  |  Filings  |  Financials  |  Options  |  Price History  |  Ratios  |  Ownership  |  Insiders  |  Valuation

Scandium International Mining Corp T.SCY

Alternate Symbol(s):  SCYYF

Scandium International Mining Corp. is a mineral exploration and development company. The Company’s advanced project is the Nyngan Scandium Project, located in New South Wales, Australia (the Nyngan Scandium Project), on which it holds a mine lease grant, a development consent, and 100% of the mineral rights. The Nyngan Scandium Project site is located approximately 450 kilometers (km) northwest of Sydney, New South Wales (NSW), Australia and approximately 20 km due west from the town of Nyngan. The Company has a 100% interest in an exploration license (EL 7977) covering the Honeybugle Scandium property. The Honeybugle Scandium property covers over 34.7 square kilometers and is located 24 km from the Nyngan Scandium Project. The property includes four distinct magnetic anomalies: Seaford, Woodlong, Yarran Park and Mallee Valley. The Company's subsidiaries include EMC Metals Australia Pty. Ltd., EMC Metals USA Inc., Scandium International Mining Corp. Norway AS and others.


TSX:SCY - Post by User

Comment by AllDutch1234567on Jan 30, 2022 6:36am
217 Views
Post# 34375714

RE:RE:SCY and Barrick: the perfect marriage!

RE:RE:SCY and Barrick: the perfect marriage!
Zerosum, thanks for your comments. I will try to address some of your concerns.
 
I’ve looked at some of Barrick’s communications and their mission statement. They clearly portray themselves as a socially responsible company. You talk a lot about stealing. ‘Trust’ is an asset, and it’s extremely valuable. Why would they put their reputation at risk by stealing IP in ways you describe? That would generate a lot of bad publicity; it makes no sense to me.
 
The 6-minute video by GP/NGM is clearly a promotional video, not a project update. They know that HPA works! An update would have sound more like this: ‘positive results’, ‘pleased with the progress’, ‘look forward to continuing our work with NGM’, etc., etc. 
No, this 6-minute video is the kind of material they would share with potential clients and partners (mining hosts). Marketing – brand building - is a process; you start with creating awareness. This video clearly signals a message: we exist, and if you are interested, follow us! It’s an invitation, nothing more, nothing less. More good news to come in 2022.
 
IMO, the risk/reward trade off seems out of balance if Barrick were to leave it with just this HPA plant at NGM: far too little rewards. 


Zerosum wrote: No marriage is perfect
They are still in the engagement stage.
And the work started well before June 2021. That’s just when our team decided to tell us about it.
Because, well you know we don’t need to know!  It started months before that.
Months! Because our CEO values silence over price discovery in the stock.
Yet, he has to use the stock to raise funds. That’s a Paradox!
 
They have NOT talked to FCX yet.
They are awaiting a go signal and proof of concept at scale from NGM first.
This is silly and unproductive IMO. FCX is ready to pounce on this tech if SCY do not get the patent. The patent can be amended further however to delays that any negative outcome to SCY at infinitum. So FCX will just steel the NGM guys who know the process and proceed and deal with lawsuits as they arrive. What provisions are in place should this happen?
Would it not be better in that case to be able to put down on paper they talked to FCX !
 
Agree WD has pulled HPA using this process already.
It’s at a scaling at what cost issue. SCY may now be concerned NGM gets tricky with the final approvals and process and steel the IP for themselves or make the final green light a delayed status while SCY whither on the vine because they know what is involves now.
 
Why would NGM (Barrick) get involved… They see the margins? Regardless of any diversity into copper and battery metals. They see the margins which put the margins in their gold production to shame. They are huge with no extra mining required. So why does SCY trade at 0.14? Sure NGM may see this as a huge opportunity to diversify into the extremely attractive market for critical minerals, globally.
 
SCY and Barrick, partners for life!
Hold on there sunshine. I would tell the team this, because they don’t seem to view it like that.
I get the impressions they will only be 50/50 partners ate NGM mine alone. Whereas therefore SCY  can then go to FCX with their tech and work out deals with their six SXEW mines in the USA.
Which however and considering they have not talked yet would suggest it would take years to sign deals. But I could be wrong maybe that could happen fast once HNG has proved this works.
 
So if you think  SCY and Barrick, partners for life! Then it’s because you think Barrick will not let this cash cow get into FCX’s hands. They will want to won it. So if that is the case what is SCY worth to this global miner in 3, 5, 10 years. Because if the BOD are haded an offer at 0.50 how do we know they don’ t snap that up. Remember 0,50 represents a huge pay day for most on the BOD while fo us smaller holders it would represent a missed  opportunity. So we had better  understand what we are worth to FCX as well and price ourselves of six to ten SXEW mines and annual production of HPA of 30 tones or even 50 tones all allotted to SCY at $6,000 cost per ton selling at $22,000 - $35,000 per ton. Then throw in CMR and Nyngan anyone care to opine on what SCY is really worth!
 
Because you would not know it’s worth anything near 30-50 tons of HPA from the way the stock acts currently. Why is that? 

 



<< Previous
Bullboard Posts
Next >>