RE:RE:Back to the top we go, we go....I agree with you CanYouSee,
Can you, to the best of your knowledge portray the true picture, what is your take on all the past PR and what is, or not coming forward?
.
.
canyousayiii wrote: Thanks Aarman. I see that you didn't address some of the misinformation. For example, PYR did not "receive" a cost estimate but "provided" it. Another one, with a price estimate of $95M-$115M for 36 torches, clearly all the assumptions about the $1.5M upfront cost are out the window and we don't have enough information to figure it out. Then, NPV is NOT revenue. What torches for cement and automotive industries are you fellas talking about? And PYR has NOT "won" the $40 million DROSRITE contract. Those are just few easy examples. Can you go over that post and fix all the misinformation so that you are not spreading it? I think it is in all of our interest to portray a true picture so that the play is not portrayed as a pump. Cheers.