RE:RE:RE:Back to the top we go, we go....That is the thing, I can't beyond what guidance 3P gives, but recognizing that he has very little control over timing. Many of the PYR products are not completely market ready right now. You can't forecast that. Drosrite is commercial, but it does not appear to have brand recognition just yet because of the frequency of sales and there is obviously competition. I was lured by torches, which are rolling slow, in hindsight not unexpected. These traditional industries roll slow. Client A, B and C are doing something, but treading very carefully. The rest are watching. This reminds me of the oil and gas industry. Big guys are very slow to change. Someone starts changing, and the rest watch. If Client A purchases the 36 torches (for one plant?), others will keep watching IMO. If those work out, then others will start buying. In oil and gas, it is almost like they let their competitors do their diligence and try things out instead of going through process themselves. The time horizon for big revenues is not this year, nor next year IMO. I am here for the long term. At some point, PYR will have to start hiring a sales force for all of its products. I invested too early on the pump and did not pay attention to how new technologies typically unwind. But, torches could make for a good investment (somewhere in the double digits but far too early to talk beyond $20) and hopefully 2 other technologies can add to it...not everything will be a hit. PYR IMO would at some point be better off to focus on the best sellers and divest of the rest. Daily pumping or bashing is irrelevant. That's for traders, who have probably done well when you consider the SP volatility.
StairwayTo wrote: I agree with you CanYouSee,
Can you, to the best of your knowledge portray the true picture, what is your take on all the past PR and what is, or not coming forward?
.
.
canyousayiii wrote: Thanks Aarman. I see that you didn't address some of the misinformation. For example, PYR did not "receive" a cost estimate but "provided" it. Another one, with a price estimate of $95M-$115M for 36 torches, clearly all the assumptions about the $1.5M upfront cost are out the window and we don't have enough information to figure it out. Then, NPV is NOT revenue. What torches for cement and automotive industries are you fellas talking about? And PYR has NOT "won" the $40 million DROSRITE contract. Those are just few easy examples. Can you go over that post and fix all the misinformation so that you are not spreading it? I think it is in all of our interest to portray a true picture so that the play is not portrayed as a pump. Cheers.