RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Definitive agreement reached Yeah after reading the NR again I see the 14.4% is on funds advanced, not project revenues. NR does not say if this 14.4% is in perpetuity.
| US refinery |
Bpd | 5600 |
Revenue $ mil | 396.4 |
50% ebitda margin | 198.2 |
14.4% on $75 mil | (10.8) |
Adj. ebitda | 187.4 |
Co’s 85.9% share | 161.0 |
Co. cash exp | (10) |
Co. ebitda | 151.0 |
Diluted shs | 122 |
ebitda/sh | $1.24 |
Multiple | 12 |
Sh value | $14.85 |
SmilingDog wrote: That's not correct.
Scenario one (the incorrect one): 28.5% equity ownership = 28.5% x $250M of EBITDA = $71M of EBITDA allocated to PE partner
Scenario two (the correct one): 14% equity x $250M of EBITDA = $35M of EBITDA + $10.8M dividend payment (14.4% x $75M investment) = $46M allocated to PE partner
There's a very big difference between $71M and $46M. At a 10x valuation multiple to ReGen, $25M of EBITDA = $250M of EV value = more than it's entire market cap today.