RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:Cadence de production - la presseThey used the numbers given by 14 analysts.
balmusette wrote: At TD they have an estimated eps of minus.03 $ for the fourth quarter. They have consolidated the eps of Bbd of the analysts they follow and averaged them to come to that figure.
I read this article this morning, and out of the blue I see minus.04$ as eps for fourth quarter. That is a good difference on the negative side.
I think the author cherry picked his analysts estimates on the ´´pessismist’´ side so to add a little drama to his text; especially a few days before the real numbers are released.
It will be especially usefull for the ´´grands nerveux’´ or ´´nervous nellies’´ that bought Bombardier shares and can’t decide when to dump them.
=MyNameIsNobody]About the analysts... when we look at sites with analyst recommendations we can see the -.04$ average but when we look at the average revenue and other info linked it looks too high for the said average.
Sometimes... some will even say most times... when taken as a whole, a group of analysts recommendations doesn't make any sense at all because of the ones that go for the extremes... optimists, pessimists or even the ones that haven't updated their analysis in too much time to have it matter anymore.
[/quote]